As automation and smart manufacturing continue to evolve, control systems are quietly undergoing a transformation. Although traditional PLCs (programmable logic controllers) still dominate many factories, more and more industries are turning to embedded industrial control systems (EICS). What is the essential difference between the two? What scenarios are they suitable for? These are questions that many manufacturing companies and system integrators must consider during the selection process.
1. Differences in architecture and functions
PLC was born in the 1960s, and its core is the logic control capability based on stability. The programming language is usually ladder diagram, which is suitable for simple switch quantity control, such as assembly line, robotic arm, etc.
The Embedded Industrial Control System is an open control system based on an embedded processor platform. It not only supports traditional I/O control, but also runs complex algorithms, graphics processing, edge computing, and even supports the deployment of industrial AI models. This makes it an important foundation for intelligent manufacturing and high-end automation.
2. System flexibility and expandability
Compared with PLC, embedded systems are more flexible. Take the Industrial Controller with PoE Support launched by MIDOVAX as an example. It integrates a high-performance network power supply (PoE) module, which not only simplifies the wiring difficulty of industrial equipment, but also facilitates the deployment of edge devices such as cameras and sensors, thereby reducing the overall deployment cost.
In addition, some models such as Industrial Embedded Controller with Xe Graphics have broken through the bottleneck of traditional industrial computers in graphics processing, supporting high-performance image recognition and machine vision, and are widely used in scenarios such as intelligent detection, AGV navigation, and smart factory monitoring.
3. Division of application scenarios
PLC is suitable for the following scenarios:
Embedded industrial control systems are suitable for the following scenarios:
For example, in the AGV automatic navigation project of the smart logistics center, PLC can only provide basic drive control, while Industrial Embedded Controller with Xe Graphics can collaborate with LiDAR and cameras to achieve real-time path planning and obstacle recognition, greatly improving the equipment's autonomous decision-making capabilities.
4. Maintenance and sustainability
PLC has strong stability and low maintenance cost, but its closed system architecture and programming environment are slightly insufficient in the face of the diverse needs of modern industry. Embedded systems support mainstream operating systems such as Linux and Windows. Developers can quickly deploy, remotely upgrade, and achieve seamless data interaction with the upper system, greatly improving sustainability and maintainability.
Under the trend of industrial digital upgrading, enterprises should not blindly rely on traditional systems, nor should they blindly pursue the latest technology. They should rationally choose the appropriate control system based on project characteristics, control requirements and future development directions.
MIDOVAX focuses on the research and development of high-performance industrial embedded systems. Its various Embedded Industrial Control Systems have been widely used in multiple industry scenarios such as intelligent manufacturing, rail transportation, and smart security. Whether you need an Industrial Embedded Controller with Xe Graphics with high graphics performance or a flexible controller with PoE power supply function, we can provide you with professional customized solutions.